Incident·WS-0110·Jul 4, 2026·in the wild·AI-powered cyberattacks

JADEPUFFER: ransomware attack run end-to-end by an AI agent

Unknown criminal actor; LLM agent (Sysdig report)

65/100
WS-4 Severe
Harm score 55, signal score 77. Autonomy: autonomous (the AI ran multi-step operations). How the scores work.
Harm 3/5
damage actually done
Reach 1/5
who was affected
Autonomy 3/4
how much the AI did on its own
Novelty 4/5
how new the behavior was
Permanence 4/5
how hard it is to undo

Sysdig documented what it called the first ransomware campaign carried out entirely by an LLM agent: reconnaissance, credential theft, lateral movement, privilege escalation, encryption and the ransom note, adapting when steps failed. More than 1,300 configuration items were encrypted and the originals deleted.

Damage

1,342 service configurations encrypted, originals deleted; ransom demanded

Did they fix it?

reopened The only fix is the old Langflow patch victims must apply themselves; the same operator came back through the same flaw in July, nobody has verified which model drove it, and there is no responsible party to respond.

  1. Reported Jul 1, 2026

    Sysdig documented what it called the first ransomware campaign run end-to-end by an LLM agent, which broke into an internet-facing Langflow instance through CVE-2025-3248 and encrypted 1,342 service configuration items while deleting the… source

  2. Response Jul 6, 2026 none

    No public response found from any model provider or from Langflow about this incident. Sysdig could not identify which model or provider the agent used and said it had 'no visibility into JADEPUFFER's system prompt or agent… source

  3. Claimed fix Jul 1, 2026 partial

    There is no responsible party to issue a fix; the only remedy is the pre-existing vendor patch. The entry point, CVE-2025-3248, was fixed in Langflow 1.3.0 and added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog in May 2025 - the… source

  4. Independent check Jul 20, 2026 partial

    No independent verification of Sysdig's 'LLM-driven' assessment was found; a Microsoft researcher speculated it ran on an open-weight model with safety training removed, which Sysdig neither confirmed nor ruled out. Rather than being… source

  5. Where it stands Jul 20, 2026 reopened

    The same actor struck again through the same unpatched Langflow flaw weeks later with a new AI-model-wiping locker; there is no named responsible party, no model attribution, no arrest, and no public activity reported since July. source

The full case, with what would change the verdict →

Sources

BleepingComputer.

Factor ratings and the score are this index’s judgments by a published formula; facts, dates and figures come from the linked sources. Where a lawsuit is pending, the summary reports allegations, not findings.