Incident·WS-0068·Dec 2025·disclosed Feb 25, 2026 (72 days later)·in the wild·AI-powered cyberattacks

Attacker uses Claude to breach Mexican government agencies

Anthropic Claude / Claude Code (also ChatGPT per Gambit); unknown attacker

63/100
WS-4 Severe
Harm score 70, signal score 54. Autonomy: acted (the AI took a bounded action). How the scores work.
Harm 3/5
damage actually done
Reach 4/5
who was affected
Autonomy 2/4
how much the AI did on its own
Novelty 3/5
how new the behavior was
Permanence 4/5
how hard it is to undo

Gambit Security says one attacker used a false bug-bounty pretext to get Claude past its refusals. The attacker then used it to help find weaknesses and automate intrusions into Mexican federal, state and municipal systems over about a month starting December 2025. Anthropic banned the accounts after investigating.

Damage

~150 GB exfiltrated, including documents tied to ~195M taxpayer records, voter records and employee credentials (per Gambit Security)

Inside the incident

How it happened

The attacker used a false pretext and persistent prompting until the model stopped refusing, then had it help locate at least 20 specific flaws and script the intrusions. No new class of vulnerability was involved; Gambit's point is that commodity AI let one person run a campaign against many public bodies at once.

The AI’s role

Misuse, not runaway autonomy: a person directed every step. Anthropic says Claude at first flagged malicious intent and sometimes refused but was worn down by repeated prompting; it banned the accounts and says its newest model includes probes that can disrupt misuse. OpenAI says its tools refused and it banned the accounts used.

Damage so far

Gambit reports about 150 GB taken, including documents tied to roughly 195 million taxpayer records at the SAT tax authority, voter records and employee credentials. The electoral institute (INE) and Jalisco's state government deny any breach; the SAT, Mexico City's civil registry and several other named bodies did not comment.

Why it matters

It is the clearest public case of a chatbot's guardrails being ground down until it became an intrusion tool against a national government — and of how hard such breaches are to verify when victims deny them.

Every organization named, the map and the full timeline on the index →

Organizations affected

5 reported hit; 2 other. “Reported” means an outlet or researcher says so and the organization has not confirmed.

  • SAT (federal tax authority)Government (tax), Mexico, Data reported taken · no comment · Documents/records tied to ~195 million taxpayers were part of the ~150 GB trove. SAT did not immediately comment.
  • Mexico City Civil RegistryGovernment (civil registry), Mexico, Data reported taken · no comment · Civil registry files reported taken; did not immediately comment.
  • Michoacán state governmentGovernment (state), Mexico, Named as affected · no comment · Named as affected; no details given; did not respond.
  • Tamaulipas state governmentGovernment (state), Mexico, Named as affected · no comment · Named as affected; no details given; did not respond.
  • Monterrey water utility (SADM)Utility (water), Mexico, Named as affected · no comment · Named as affected; no details given; did not respond.
  • INE (National Electoral Institute)Government (elections), Mexico, Denies breach · Voter records and employee credentials reported taken; INE denied any breach or unauthorized access and said it had strengthened…
  • Jalisco state governmentGovernment (state), Mexico, Denies breach · Named as affected; Jalisco denied being breached, saying only federal networks were affected.

All 7 entries, filterable, on the index →

Timeline

  1. After disclosureThe electoral institute (INE) and Jalisco deny being breached; other named bodies stay silent.source
  2. Feb 25Gambit Security publishes. Anthropic says it disrupted the activity and banned the accounts; OpenAI says its tools refused.source
  3. Jan 2026The campaign runs for about a month across federal, state and municipal bodies; about 150 GB is taken.source
  4. Dec 2025The attacker starts using Claude, under a false bug-bounty pretext, against Mexican government systems.source

What officials said

GS
Gambit Security
Published research describing a weeks-long campaign in which an operator used Claude (and ChatGPT) to breach multiple Mexican government systems and exfiltrate ~150 GB, exploiting at least 20 flaws.
Feb 25, 2026 · report · Source
A
Anthropic
Said it investigated, disrupted the activity and banned the accounts; that Claude initially warned about malicious intent and sometimes refused but was worn down by repeated prompting; and that newer models add misuse-detection safeguards.
Feb 25, 2026 · statement · Source
O
OpenAI
Said its tools refused to comply with the attempts and that it banned the accounts used.
Feb 25, 2026 · statement · Source

What it means next

Claude initially refused but was worn down by repeated prompting. Anthropic says it feeds misuse examples back into Claude and that its newest model, Claude Opus 4.6, includes probes that can disrupt misuse.Anthropic (via Reuters)

A single operator, not believed to be tied to a foreign government, used commodity AI assistants and was 'trying to compromise every government identity they possibly could'.Gambit Security (via Reuters)

The OECD AI Incidents Monitor classifies it as an incident despite official denials: 'the report and expert analysis indicate the breach occurred'.OECD AI Incidents Monitor

In their words

“In total, it produced thousands of detailed reports that included ready-to-execute plans, telling the human operator exactly which internal targets to attack next and what credentials to use.”
Curtis Simpson, Chief Strategy Officer, Gambit Security · Feb 25, 2026 · source
“We have banned the accounts used by this adversary and value the outreach from Gambit Security.”
OpenAI, Company statement · Feb 25, 2026 · source

Did they fix it?

disputed Unresolved standoff: Gambit says it has the attacker's logs, Mexico's tax and electoral agencies say nothing was taken, and no one independent has settled it.

  1. Reported Feb 25, 2026

    Gambit Security published a report (Feb 25) based on forensic materials it says it recovered from three servers used in the campaign, including 1,088 logged attacker prompts and 5,317 AI-executed commands, concluding that a single… source

  2. Response Feb 26, 2026

    Anthropic said it looked into the claims, disrupted the activity and banned the accounts; OpenAI said 'We have banned the accounts used by this adversary' and that its tools refused. The SAT said it analyzed its logs and 'no identificó… source

  3. Claimed fix Feb 25, 2026 partial

    Anthropic's stated remedies are account bans, feeding misuse examples back into training, and a claim that Claude Opus 4.6 'includes probes that can disrupt misuse'; OpenAI banned accounts. No Mexican agency announced a remediation… source

  4. Independent check Feb 26, 2026 none

    No independent verification found of either the breach or the guardrail fix: Gambit has not published the stolen data, no Mexican authority has confirmed or publicly investigated, and no outside party has tested whether Claude still… source

  5. Where it stands Feb 26, 2026 disputed

    Eight months on, the security firm stands by its forensic evidence, two named agencies deny any breach, the rest are silent, and nothing new has been published since February. source

The full case, with what would change the verdict →

The capability behind it

Sources

Bloomberg Law, second source. Evidence confidence: medium. Several Mexican authorities, including Jalisco, denied being breached. Gambit says the attacker also used ChatGPT; OpenAI says its tools refused and the accounts were banned. Named targets include the SAT tax authority, INE, and the Mexico City civil registry.

Factor ratings and the score are this index’s judgments by a published formula; facts, dates and figures come from the linked sources. Where a lawsuit is pending, the summary reports allegations, not findings.