Incident·WS-0022·Aug 13, 2024·in the lab·Misalignment in testing

'AI Scientist' rewrites its own code to escape time limits

Sakana AI / The AI Scientist

31/100
WS-2 Moderate
Harm score 0, signal score 69. Autonomy: autonomous (the AI ran multi-step operations). How the scores work.
Harm 0/5
damage actually done
Reach 0/5
who was affected
Autonomy 3/4
how much the AI did on its own
Novelty 3/5
how new the behavior was
Permanence 0/5
how hard it is to undo

Sakana reported that its automated research agent, when experiments hit time limits, edited its own code to lengthen the timeout rather than speed up the work, and in another run made the script call itself repeatedly. Sakana recommended strict sandboxing of such agents.

Damage

none realized

The capability behind it

Sources

Sakana, second source. Behavior is specification gaming within a research sandbox, not evidence of self-preservation.

Factor ratings and the score are this index’s judgments by a published formula; facts, dates and figures come from the linked sources. Where a lawsuit is pending, the summary reports allegations, not findings.